OPEN Foundation

Search
Close this search box.

Articles

Psychedelic Assisted Therapy for Treating Addiction – Part 2

Psychedelic Assisted Therapy for Treating Addiction – Part 2

Read part 1 here

Introduction

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of psychedelic therapy as a novel approach for the treatment of addiction. This interest stems from a growing body of research exploring the therapeutic effects of psychedelic substances on addictive behaviors, particularly psilocybin and LSD. In his past seminar titled “Euphoria: The New Science of Addiction and Psychedelic Therapy,” Dr. Rayyan Zafar, a prominent researcher in the field, delves into the key insights and findings spanning from observational studies, clinical trials, and historical investigations with psychedelics in addiction treatment. Dr. Zafar sheds light on the historical context, scientific progress, and prospects of psychedelic therapy in addiction treatment. This blog post aims to summarize and analyze the key takeaways from Dr. Zafar’s seminar, providing readers with a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of addiction treatment and the role of psychedelic therapy within it.

Key Takeaways from “Euphoria: The New Science of Addiction and Psychedelic Therapy”

 

Comprehensive Review of Psychedelic Therapy in Addiction Treatment


Dr. Zafar’s past seminar offered an in-depth examination of the potential of psychedelic therapy in treating addiction, drawing on a diverse range of research sources. The exploration begins with historical studies dating back to the mid to late 1900s, shedding light on the origins of psychedelic research and its developmental trajectory. Both classic (e.g. psilocybin, LSD, and DMT) and non-classical psychedelics (e.g. 6-MeO-DMT, ketamine, and MDMA) were discussed but due to the limited scope of this article, only the classic ones, psilocybin and LSD, will be highlighted. 

The first realization of the powerful effect of LSD on mood and cognition in 1943 presumably marked the beginning of a modern era in which psychedelic drugs could be used to treat certain mental and behavioral conditions. From the 1940s and early 1970s, classic psychedelics were actively researched in humans as both a pharmacological tool to understand its effects on the mind and brain and as a therapeutics. Collectively, LSD was seen as a promising treatment for numerous serious mental health disorders such as depression, alcoholism, and other substance use disorders (Hofman, 1980). Furthermore, it has a favorable safety profile and had profound short-term psychological effects (Krebs). This led to a potential breakthrough in the treatment of various mental illnesses, including different forms of drug addiction (Belouin). 

Between the late 1950s and early 1970s, approximately 40,000 patients worldwide suffering from various mental disorders, including substance use disorders, received treatment with psychedelics such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin, are documented over 1000 publications (Grinspoon). A key finding was that psychedelics are well-tolerated and induce a low risk of adverse side events (online event).

A controlled study investigating LSD’s efficacy in adjunction to psychotherapy in treating heroin addiction was influential. It was revealed that 33% of 36 participants in the treatment group (n= 73) maintained a abstinence after one year compared to the control group with a mere 5% success rate. However, only 5% maintain complete abstinence after the fulfilling the treatment program (Savage, 1973). Furthermore, a meta-analysis collected data about LSD in alcoholism from six randomized controlled trials that were published in the 1960s with over 500 participants and showed that LSD doubled the odds that patients would be abstinent at first follow-up, as defined by (OR = 2.07). Yet, this was not seen after a year (Krebs). 

Even though there is quite a large amount of historical data showing a positive trend toward the therapeutic role of psychedelics in addiction treatment, the evidence from these studies remains inconclusive due to methodological inconsistencies. More specifically, these inconsistencies encompassed deficiencies in study design, such as the lack of proper controls, blinding, follow-up protocols, statistical analyses, and the utilization of validated assessments, as evaluated through contemporary research standards (Rucker). 

Groundbreaking Investigations into Addiction Treatment with Psychedelic-assisted Therapy

The widespread use of psychedelics in the 1960s fueled a counterculture movement, prompting a political backlash and leading to increased regulatory controls by the FDA. This culminated in the establishment of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in 1970 under Richard Nixon, effectively halting psychedelic research (Belouin). However, efforts to explore the therapeutic potential of psychedelics resumed in the 1990s with renewed scientific interest and advanced research methodologies (Belouin; Zafar).

Dr. Zafar provided an overview of the latest findings from these investigations, illuminating the favorable prospects of psychedelics in addiction recovery. Ongoing clinical trials exploring the potential therapeutic role of psychedelics in addiction cover a diverse spectrum of substances and addiction types, ranging from alcohol and tobacco to methamphetamine and gambling addiction. Due to the limited scope of this article, only psilocybin in alcohol and tobacco will be highlighted. These trials aim to expand upon initial findings and set the stage for larger-scale studies that would ultimately secure regulatory approval. 

The promising results of earlier research on psychedelics and alcohol addiction have prompted a modern replication open-label study examining psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence (Bogenschutz et el., 2015). In the little sneak preview of last week, the study of psilocybin in conjunction with Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) was discussed. The figure illustrates the change in percent drinking days and percent heavy drinking days. The blue line in the graph represent the % of drinking days while the red line represent the % heavy drinking days. After the first administration with psilocybin, both percent drinking and heavy drinking days were statistically significant lower than baseline in all the follow-up points. 

To explore the relationship between the intensity of the psilocybin-induced experience with changes in drinking behavior, the acute effects of psilocybin were measured by the Mystical Experiences Questionnaire (MEQ). It was also found to correlate with changes in drinking behavior, craving, and self-efficacy (Bogenschutz, 2015). 

The mystical experiences induced by psilocybin are characterized by immediate sensations of unity, sacredness, a sense of understanding beyond ordinary knowledge, positive mood, transcendence of notions of space and time, and an inability to adequately describe the experience (e.g., ineffability; Griffiths, 2006). These dimensions seem to be common across ages, cultures, ethnicities, and genders (online seminar Johnson). The hallmark of the mystical experience lies in the profound sense of being influenced by forces greater than oneself, often accompanied by intense emotions, sparking enduring and transformative changes in one’s life (Miller). 

To build upon the findings of the study of Bogenschutz et al. (2015), the research group investigated psilocybin in a so-called phase 2 double-blind randomized clinical trial (Bogenschutz, 2022). On one hand, it was observed that the psilocybin group had lower percentage  in heavy drinking days and mean daily alcohol consumption (number of standard drinks per day) compared to the group that was given diphenhydramine as a control. On the other hand, the percentage of drinking days was not statistically reduced (29 in psilocybin group vs 43 in control groups). However, important limitations need to be pointed out. There were some methodological issues that could lead to a higher risk of making incorrect inferences about the data.This study is currently undergoing replication in larger phase III trials across multiple centers, advancing toward creating more data regarding the efficacy of the psychedelic drug and potential marketing authorization for this indication (Zafar).

The effects of psilocybin have also been investigated in conjunction with CBT for the treatment of tobacco addiction. In this open-label study, individuals were given two to three moderate to high doses (20 and 30 mg/70kg) of psilocybin (Johnson, 2017). Results based on urinary and breath analyses showed that 60% of the group did not smoke after one year of follow-up. This is a seemingly big difference compared to the 35% of what is usually observed in traditional tobacco treatment paradigms (Cahill, 2014). In the acknowledgment of the lack of drawing definitive conclusions based on open-label studies and the lack of a control group, a randomized comparative efficacy study has been performed and the results remain yet to be published. 

Future Applications with Neuroimaging Techniques

Various neuroimaging techniques are able to provide insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of psychedelic therapy and how these relate to clinical outcomes in the treatment of addiction. These techniques include functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans and enable researchers to map changes in both brain activity and connectivity, offering a deeper understanding of addiction mechanisms and treatment outcomes. Despite the relative scarcity of literature on the neurobiological mechanisms of psychedelics in addiction, recent studies have shed light on potential pathways such as reward, inhibitory control, and stress (Hayes).

Neuroimaging studies are invaluable in identifying biomarkers associated with substance dependence. These biomarkers serve as an objective measurement of bodily activity and, thus, aim to elucidate the mechanisms and conditions under which treatments prove effective. For instance, PET and SPECT, have enabled researchers to delve into the molecular dynamics of addiction within the living human brain. These methods have unveiled specific neuroreceptor biomarkers associated with different subclasses of addiction. Take, for example, the findings regarding dopamine receptors in alcohol and stimulant use disorder (Nutt et al., 2015), opioid receptors in cocaine (Gorelick et al., 2005), and opioid dependence (Williams et al., 2007). Such insights have not only paved the way for a deeper understanding of addiction pathology but also presented novel targets for therapeutic intervention. 

Furthermore, by utilizing radioligands, neurotransmitter release studies have offered valuable insights into the dynamics of neurotransmission in addiction. The dopamine system has been widely implicated in addiction theory (Nutt, 2015; Zafar). In addiction, specifically, a blunted dopamine release in a brain region called the nucleus accumbens has been observed after a drug was given. When investigating the effect of psychedelics on addiction, it has been suggested that there is a potential link between psychedelics and dopamine release (Martin et al., 2024; Vollenweider et al. 1999). Yet, so far neurochemical studies have been done in non-humans and futher research is warranted (Nutt, 2015).

Dr. Zafar discusses that advanced multimodal neuroimaging techniques are necessary to directly assess the effects of psychedelic therapy on neurotransmission and brain function in individuals with addiction. For example, multimodal imaging studies combining PET and fMRI have proposed that psychedelic therapy may lead to increases in endogenous dopamine levels in addiction disorders, potentially reflecting improved brain function and treatment outcomes. One of his future scientific endeavors will investigate using fMRI and EEG to investigate differences between pre-and post-administration with psilocybin. Ultimately, these advances ultimately pave the way for more personalized and efficient approaches to address substance dependence (Moeller).

Addressing Challenges and Knowledge Gaps

While the collective data on psychedelics and addiction suggests a positive trend toward reducing substance use, and cravings, and fostering abstinence compared to conventional treatments, several critical knowledge gaps and controversies persist, necessitating further exploration and clarification. Besides the limitations associated with naturalistic, observational, open-label, and animal studies, we will highlight some knowledge gaps that are critical to address when exploring psychedelics and addiction. Indeed, when one door closes, another hundred seem to open.

One of the main remaining questions is: “What mediates the long-term effects of psychedelics?”

The enduring psychological and behavioral changes observed after psychedelic use may be partly influenced by the immediate, often subjectively positive effects of 5-HT2A receptor agonists, which are occasionally described as mystical or transcendent (Bogenschutz 2015; Calder; Griffiths 2006, 2008, 2011; Johnson 2017; Rothberg; Tap; Yaden). Griffiths (2011) even found that psilocybin can affect the Big Five personality traits, typically considered stable, by increasing openness. Similar associations between greater mystical experiences and improved outcomes were observed in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) for smoking cessation (Johnson, 2017). The findings suggest that psilocybin-assisted treatment has lasting impacts beyond the drug’s immediate effects, with participants ranking their psilocybin experiences as some of the most personally significant and spiritually impactful, correlating with higher smoking cessation rates (Johnson 2017).

While these studies did not explicitly focus on spirituality, the findings raise questions about its role in the effects of psychedelic drugs on addiction. The emotion of awe is suggested as a crucial mechanism driving mystical experiences during psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (Kan). Awe fosters feelings of interconnectedness and unity, which are central to the transformative effects of psychedelic therapy (Griffiths, 2008). Data indicates that more profound mystical experiences increase the likelihood of smoking cessation (Johnson, 2017). However, not all mystical experiences lead to lasting change, and individuals may return to their previous state. Future randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with multiple follow-up assessments are necessary to establish causality and determine the clinical significance of these mechanisms.

Another remaining question concerns the use of a particular therapeutic framework when psychedelics are administered to individuals with addiction. The literature is clear that psychotherapy plays a crucial role in addiction treatment, but it remains unknown what the right amount and particular type of psychotherapeutic intervention and relapse prevention is best. Some studies indicate that group therapy alongside psychedelic use may enhance group connectedness and interpersonal understanding, potentially promoting prosocial behavior (Ponomarenko). While mystical experiences often foster profound connections with others and the universe, solo settings remain prevalent, though both solo and group therapies have shown no significant differences in mental health perceptions (Byrne).

Another remaining question is “How do psychedelics impact the neural circuits implicated in addiction?” Answers to these questions can give insights into how to optimize the development of psychedelic-assisted therapies. Psychedelics may disrupt networks associated with addiction and enhance connectivity across the brain, fostering neuroplasticity and facilitating the relearning of behaviors (Carhart-Harris; Calder; Nutt 2023; online event; Tap). However, understanding these neuroplasticity mechanisms remains limited, with studies primarily conducted on animal models and cell lines (Calder)

Become a member if you would like to know the details of the past online seminar about psychedelics and addiction!

Conclusion 

In conclusion, the field of addiction treatment is undergoing a profound transformation with the exploration of psychedelic therapy. Early research indicates that psychedelics like psilocybin and LSD show a positive trend in reducing addictive behaviors, supported by both historical and somewhat by modern clinical trials. By leveraging cutting-edge techniques, neuroimaging studies, researchers can elucidate the underlying mechanisms of psychedelic interventions and tailor treatments to individual needs. Despite the promising data, methodological inconsistencies and knowledge gaps remain, necessitating further rigorous research. Looking ahead, the future of psychedelics and addiction holds some promise, fueled by groundbreaking research, innovative treatment modalities, and a growing understanding of the complex interplay between neuroscience, psychology, and pharmacology. 

By Gwendolyn Drossaert


Become a member to get access to recordings of past and upcoming live online events with leading experts in psychedelic research and therapy.

References

  1. Belouin, S. J., & Henningfield, J. E. (2018). Psychedelics: Where we are now, why we got here, what we must do. Neuropharmacology, 142, 7-19.
  2. Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A., Wilcox, C. E., Barbosa, P. C., & Strassman, R. J. (2015). Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. Journal of psychopharmacology, 29(3), 289-299.
  3. Bogenschutz, M. P., Ross, S., Bhatt, S., Baron, T., Forcehimes, A. A., Laska, E., … & Worth, L. (2022). Percentage of heavy drinking days following psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy vs placebo in the treatment of adult patients with alcohol use disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA psychiatry, 79(10), 953-962.
  4. Byrne, K. J., Lindsay, S., Baker, N., Schmutz, C., & Lewis, B. (2023). In naturalistic psychedelic use, group use is common and acceptable. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 7(2), 100-113.
  5. Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Nutt, D. J. (2017). Serotonin and brain function: a tale of two receptors. Journal of psychopharmacology, 31(9), 1091-1120.
  6. Cahill, K., Stevens, S., & Lancaster, T. (2014). Pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation. Jama, 311(2), 193-194.
  7. Calder, A. E., & Hasler, G. (2023). Towards an understanding of psychedelic-induced neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology, 48(1), 104-112.
  8. Cameron, L. P., Tombari, R. J., Lu, J., Pell, A. J., Hurley, Z. Q., Ehinger, Y., … & Olson, D. E. (2021). A non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analogue with therapeutic potential. Nature, 589(7842), 474-479.
  9. Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Richards, B. D., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2011). Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology, 218, 649-665.
  10. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Johnson, M. W., McCann, U. D., & Jesse, R. (2008). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of psychopharmacology, 22(6), 621-632.
  11. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., McCann, U., & Jesse, R. (2006). Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology, 187, 268-283.
  12. Grinspoon, L., & Bakalar, J. B. (1979). Psychedelic drugs reconsidered (Vol. 168, pp. 163-166). New York: Basic Books.
  13. Hayes, A., Herlinger, K., Paterson, L., & Lingford-Hughes, A. (2020). The neurobiology of substance use and addiction: evidence from neuroimaging and relevance to treatment. BJPsych Advances, 26(6), 367-378.
  14. Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., & Griffiths, R. R. (2017). Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 43(1), 55-60.
  15. Gorelick, D. A., Kim, Y. K., Bencherif, B., Boyd, S. J., Nelson, R., Copersino, M., … & Frost, J. J. (2005). Imaging brain mu-opioid receptors in abstinent cocaine users: time course and relation to cocaine craving. Biological psychiatry, 57(12), 1573-1582.
  16. Krebs, T. S., & Johansen, P. Ø. (2012). Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for alcoholism: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26(7), 994-1002.
  17. Lingford-Hughes, A., Reid, A. G., Myers, J., Feeney, A., Hammers, A., Taylor, L. G., … & Nutt, D. J. (2012). A [11C] Ro15 4513 PET study suggests that alcohol dependence in man is associated with reduced α5 benzodiazepine receptors in limbic regions. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 26(2), 273-281.
  18. Martin, D. A., Delgado, A., & Calu, D. J. (2024). The psychedelic, DOI, increases dopamine release in nucleus accumbens to predictable rewards and reward cues. bioRxiv, 2024-03.
  19. Miller, W. R., & C’de Baca, J. (2001). Quantum change: When epiphanies and sudden insights transform ordinary lives. Guilford Press.
  20. Moeller, S. J., & Paulus, M. P. (2018). Toward biomarkers of the addicted human brain: Using neuroimaging to predict relapse and sustained abstinence in substance use disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 80, 143-154.
  21. Nutt, D. J., Lingford-Hughes, A., Erritzoe, D., & Stokes, P. R. (2015). The dopamine theory of addiction: 40 years of highs and lows. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(5), 305-312.
  22. Nutt, D., Spriggs, M., & Erritzoe, D. (2023). Psychedelics therapeutics: what we know, what we think, and what we need to research. Neuropharmacology, 223, 109257.
  23. Ponomarenko, P., Seragnoli, F., Calder, A., Oehen, P., & Hasler, G. (2023). Can psychedelics enhance group psychotherapy? A discussion on the therapeutic factors. Journal of psychopharmacology, 37(7), 660-678.
  24. Rothberg, R. L., Azhari, N., Haug, N. A., & Dakwar, E. (2021). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by ketamine mediate its impact on at-risk drinking: Results from a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 35(2), 150-158.
  25. Rucker, J. J., Iliff, J., & Nutt, D. J. (2018). Psychiatry & the psychedelic drugs. Past, present & future. Neuropharmacology, 142, 200-218.
  26. Savage, C., & McCabe, O. L. (1973). Residential psychedelic (LSD) therapy for the narcotic addict: a controlled study. Archives of general psychiatry, 28(6), 808-814.
  27. Stokes, P. R., Benecke, A., Myers, J., Erritzoe, D., Watson, B. J., Kalk, N., … & Lingford-Hughes, A. R. (2013). History of cigarette smoking is associated with higher limbic GABAA receptor availability. Neuroimage, 69, 70-77.
  28. Vollenweider, F. X., Vontobel, P., Hell, D., & Leenders, K. L. (1999). 5-HT modulation of dopamine release in basal ganglia in psilocybin-induced psychosis in man—a PET study with [11C] raclopride. Neuropsychopharmacology, 20(5), 424-433.
  29. Yaden, D. B., Berghella, A. P., Regier, P. S., Garcia-Romeu, A., Johnson, M. W., & Hendricks, P. S. (2021). Classic psychedelics in the treatment of substance use disorder: potential synergies with twelve-step programs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 98, 103380.
  30. Williams, T. M., Daglish, M. R., Lingford-Hughes, A., Taylor, L. G., Hammers, A., Brooks, D. J., … & Nutt, D. J. (2007). Brain opioid receptor binding in early abstinence from opioid dependence: positron emission tomography study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 63-69.
  31. Online event
  32. Tap, S. C. (2024). The potential of 5‐methoxy‐N, N‐dimethyltryptamine in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A first look at therapeutic mechanisms of action. Addiction Biology, 29(4), e13386.
  33. Zafar, R., Siegel, M., Harding, R., Barba, T., Agnorelli, C., Suseelan, S., … & Erritzoe, D. (2023). Psychedelic therapy in the treatment of addiction: the past, present and future. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1183740.

Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Psychedelics in Neurological Disorders: Non-hallucinogenic vs Hallucinogenic

DALL·E 2024-05-27 18.08.31 - An abstract illustration of the brain highlighting areas related to neuroplasticity. The style is modern and scientific, with bright colors and clear

Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Psychedelics in Neurological Disorders: Non-hallucinogenic vs Hallucinogenic

Written by Guilherme Gabriel

In recent years, psychedelics like psilocybin and LSD have gained significant attention for their potential to treat neuropsychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and addiction 1. This shift in perspective is leading to increased acceptance among psychotherapists and psychiatrists, paralleling the clinical use of esketamine. Concurrently, there is a growing interest in understanding the mechanisms by which psychedelics and their analogues exert their effects, with the goal of designing novel neuropharmaceuticals 2.

Mechanisms of Action

Psychedelics primarily act through the serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, which activates both Gαq/11 and β-arrestin2 pathways (Figure 1.). However, it is still unclear which of these pathways is more critical for the therapeutic effects. Recent studies have shown that hallucinogenic psychedelics (e.g., psilocybin) and non-hallucinogenic psychedelics (e.g., Tabernanthalog, or TBG) may differentially activate these pathways 3. This differential activation can lead to changes in chromatin states at gene enhancers involved in synapse organization and neuronal plasticity 4.  Despite these findings, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the cellular and neural mechanisms linking psychedelic-induced synaptic plasticity to behavioral outcomes. Additionally, it is unknown whether non-hallucinogenic psychedelics promote plasticity through the same mechanisms 5.

. Biased signaling of 5-HT2AR: Gq- dependent and beta-arrestin dependent. nhP: non-hallucinogenic Psychedelics; hP: hallucinogenic Psychedelic.

Figure 1. Biased signaling of 5-HT2AR: Gq- dependent and beta-arrestin dependent. nhP: non-hallucinogenic Psychedelics; hP: hallucinogenic Psychedelic.

Psychoplastogens: A New Class of Compounds

Psychoplastogens are substances capable of rapidly inducing structural and functional neuronal plasticity, which can modulate cognitive functions. These compounds may help rescue neuronal atrophy seen in many neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders by modulating neurotrophic factor expression, activating neuronal repair mechanisms, and mediating immune responses. The therapeutic potential of these compounds has been increasingly recognized, emphasizing the need to investigate existing natural compounds before embarking on the lengthy process of synthesizing new ones. This approach could leverage existing knowledge and reduce the costs associated with developing new substances 6.

Differentiating Psychedelics

Psychedelics are a family of psychoactive substances that induce altered states of consciousness, profoundly changing thoughts, emotions, and perceptions. They are distinct from other psychoactive compounds such as cannabinoids (e.g., THC), entactogens (e.g., MDMA), and dissociatives (e.g., ketamine). Despite strict regulations and illegality in many countries, there is a need to develop new psychedelic-based therapeutics with optimized pharmacological profiles to ensure safety and efficacy 7.

Psychedelics can be chemically classified into three main types: tryptamine analogues, ergoline derivatives, and phenethylamines.

Tryptamine Analogues

These compounds share the structural backbone of serotonin. Psilocybin and DMT are notable examples. Psilocybin, found in “magic mushrooms,” is converted in the body to its active form, psilocin, which produces mind-altering effects. DMT induces rapid and intense psychedelic experiences but has a short duration of action. It is necessary to balance the therapeutic potential with the strong hallucinogenic effects for clinical use.

Ergoline Derivatives

LSD is the primary example of this class, known for its potent hallucinogenic effects. Research is ongoing to develop non-hallucinogenic derivatives that can provide therapeutic benefits without the intense psychedelic experiences.

Phenethylamines

Mescaline, derived from certain cacti, is a key compound in this class. It produces visual and auditory hallucinations and has been studied for its potential therapeutic effects 7.

Non-Hallucinogenic 5-HT2AR Agonists

The therapeutic effects of psychedelics are often believed to be coupled with their hallucinogenic properties. However, preclinical evidence suggests that these effects can be separated. This raises an important question: how can we preserve the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics while minimizing or eliminating the hallucinogenic effects? A limited number of non-hallucinogenic 5-HT2A agonists have been identified. For example, 6-F-DET, a tryptamine analogue, lacks hallucinogenic effects but also has weak functional activity. Ergoline derivatives such as 2-Br-LSD and lisuride have shown potential for treating depression and other psychiatric disorders in animal studies, though lisuride has induced hallucinations in some patients with Parkinson’s disease 7.

IsoDMT derivatives, introduced in the 1980s, represent another group of non-hallucinogenic 5-HT2A agonists. Compounds like isoDMT and 5-OMe-isoDMT have been identified as non-hallucinogenic through drug discrimination tests. Recent studies by the Olson group have reported a series of isoDMT compounds that promote neuronal growth and have significant antidepressant effects in mouse models, presenting significant interest as psychoplastogens for clinical applications 8. One such compound, AAZ-A-154, has shown promise as a non-hallucinogenic psychoplastogen. Another compound, TBG, a simplified analogue of ibogaine, has been found to increase dendritic arborization and spine density in rat cortical neurons.

Future Directions and Clinical Applications

The potential to repurpose psychedelics for treating not only cognitive disorders but also neurological conditions characterized by neuronal atrophy is growing. However, substantial research is still needed to elucidate how these compounds stimulate neuroplastic mechanisms. It is crucial to determine the developmental stages at which treatment is most beneficial and understand how these compounds affect neuronal networks at different scales 9.

From a medicinal chemistry perspective, there is an urgent need to develop new chemical entities with optimized pharmacological profiles to create more effective and safer psychedelic-based therapeutics. This includes supporting research on 5-HT2A receptor agonists for use in various disorders, starting with antidepressants. Disturbances in 5-HT2A receptor signaling are well-known to be implicated in mental disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and addiction.

Advanced techniques are being developed to thoroughly investigate the hallucinogenic properties of psychedelics. These include novel recombinant receptors and optimized functional assays that help understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of psychedelics. As these compounds move towards clinical trials, it is essential to develop and use appropriate preclinical models that can accurately measure their hallucinogenic behaviors. While translating findings from rodents to humans is challenging, behavioral assays like the Head-Twitch Response (HTR) have been developed to distinguish between hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic psychedelics in vivo. 7

Conclusion

There is a growing space for the therapeutic use of psychedelic compounds, which can potentially be applied to both cognitive and neurological disorders characterized by neuronal atrophy. However, a considerable amount of research is still needed to fully understand how these compounds stimulate neuroplasticity and determine the most effective stages for treatment. This knowledge will help in developing new therapies that can effectively manipulate neuronal networks and provide significant benefits for a range of brain conditions.

 

References

  1. Mastinu, A. et al. The Bright Side of Psychedelics: Latest Advances and Challenges in Neuropharmacology. IJMS 24, 1329 (2023).
  2. Lowe, H. et al. Psychedelics: Alternative and Potential Therapeutic Options for Treating Mood and Anxiety Disorders. Molecules 27, 2520 (2022).
  3. Wallach, J. et al. Identification of 5-HT2A receptor signaling pathways associated with psychedelic potential. Nat Commun 14, 8221 (2023).
  4. Cameron, L. P. et al. A non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analogue with therapeutic potential. Nature 589, 474–479 (2021).
  5. De La Fuente Revenga, M. et al. Prolonged epigenomic and synaptic plasticity alterations following single exposure to a psychedelic in mice. Cell Reports 37, 109836 (2021).
  6. Benko, J. & Vranková, S. Natural Psychoplastogens As Antidepressant Agents. Molecules 25, 1172 (2020).
  7. Duan, W., Cao, D., Wang, S. & Cheng, J. Serotonin 2A Receptor (5-HT 2A R) Agonists: Psychedelics and Non-Hallucinogenic Analogues as Emerging Antidepressants. Chem. Rev. 124, 124–163 (2024).
  8. Dong, C. et al. Psychedelic-inspired drug discovery using an engineered biosensor. Cell 184, 2779-2792.e18 (2021).
  9. Saeger, H. N. & Olson, D. E. Psychedelic‐inspired approaches for treating neurodegenerative disorders. Journal of Neurochemistry 162, 109–127 (2022).

Psychedelic Assisted Therapy for treating Addiction – Part 1

Psychedelic Assisted Therapy for treating Addiction – Part 1

In recent years, there has been an increase in interest in the use of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) to help individuals suffering from their addiction. Despite the promising findings from recent clinical trials, many questions remain. How exactly does PAT  work to treat addiction? Which different psychedelics are used? What are their potential risks and benefits? 

Introduction

Addiction, in its myriad forms, continues to pose a significant challenge to global public health. Recent studies suggest that up to 6% of individuals contend with substance-related issues, with prevalence rates showing an upward trend (Ritchie). Addiction’s cyclical nature, propelled by shifts in brain chemistry, reinforces compulsive behaviors despite adverse outcomes, contributing to a concerning rise in substance-related fatalities. Legal substances like alcohol and tobacco, as per the World Drug Report (2022), account for the primary contributors to morbidity and mortality associated with substance use, while illegal drugs such as psychedelics, amphetamines, and opiates collectively contribute to 5% of the global addiction burden. In the Netherlands, two million individuals are affected by addiction, and in roughly 1,6 million of the cases it involves legal substances such as tobacco and alcohol (LADIS Tussenrapportage Kerncijfers Verslavingszorg, 2016-2021). 

The grip of addiction does not only devastate the lives of those afflicted, but it also has a significant impact on families, communities, and society at large. Despite decades of research and numerous interventions, addiction remains a formidable challenge for healthcare professionals worldwide. Indeed, traditional treatment approaches, such as pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, have demonstrated limited efficacy (Kan; Hayes; Zafar). Research has shown that most individuals often end up relapsing within six months (Hayes), highlighting the need for more innovative solutions. It is within this landscape of unmet medical needs that alternative therapies, such as psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), are gaining more and more traction in recent years. It can be considered a novel therapeutic paradigm as it harnesses the psychoactive properties of certain psychedelic drugs to help facilitate the psychotherapeutic process. Unlike conventional addiction treatments that focus solely on symptom management, therapy assisted with psychedelics aims to address the root causes of addiction by inducing transformative experiences that promote introspection, emotional processing, and behavior change, ultimately hoping for long-term recovery. 

Defining Addiction

Definition and types of addiction

Addiction is formally defined as the continued use of a harmful substance despite adverse consequences. Core features of addiction include the compulsive pursuit of pleasurable stimuli, fixation on substances or behaviors, and continued engagement despite adverse consequences (Koob, all). Decades of research demonstrate that addiction manifests as a deeply entrenched behavioral pattern influenced by alterations in brain function, environmental factors, and psychological dynamics (Koob, all; Heilig). Repeated substance use induces changes in brain functioning, framing addiction as a neuropsychological disorder. 

It’s important to differentiate between two distinct aspects of addiction: controlled substance use and the inability to resist the substance or behavior. These represent separate dimensions that collectively encompass the spectrum of addiction, including drug use, dependence, and abuse. 

Controlled substance use refers to instances where an individual may regularly consume a substance, but can manage and regulate their usage without experiencing significant negative consequences. This type of use may not necessarily indicate addiction. On the other hand, the inability to resist substance use or behavior signifies a loss of control, where individuals continue to engage in the behavior despite adverse outcomes. This aspect is characteristic of addiction and encompasses both dependence, where the body becomes reliant on the substance, and abuse, which involves harmful patterns of use. By recognizing these distinctions, we gain a clearer understanding of the multifaceted nature of addiction and can tailor interventions and support accordingly.

In the realm of psychiatry research, addiction is typically classified according to either the DSM-5 or the ICD-11 systems. While DSM-5 is prevalent in research contexts, ICD-11 finds broader application in clinical settings. The DSM-5 conceptualizes addiction along a continuum, whereas the ICD-11 delineates between ‘harmful use’ and ‘dependence.’ Consequently, DSM-5 lacks the detail to distinguish between mild and severe dependence. This variance can significantly impact the interpretation and comparison of addiction studies (Hayes). It’s imperative to note that dependence does not inherently equate to addiction, as dependence primarily relates to tolerance and withdrawal, while addiction encompasses complex behaviors involving drug-seeking and craving (Hayes).

Understanding Addiction

The field of cognitive neuroscience has recently focused on understanding addiction by looking at its genetic, cellular, and molecular mechanisms. Addiction can be defined by an individual’s biology, which helps explain why someone might initially smoke in social settings but eventually become unable to resist despite the high risk of lung cancer. Addiction makes self-regulation difficult, according to Heilig and Koob (2010). Simply put, addiction makes a person have difficulties with self-regulation (Heilig; Koob 2010). 

Chronic substance use or harmful behavior significantly impacts neural networks involved in reward processing, inhibitory control, stress response, emotional regulation, and learning/memory, among others, as identified by Koob (2010). One of the most notable findings is that the persistent use of drugs can significantly alter the brain’s structure and function. For example, increases or decreases in the reward system (e.g. ventral striatum) perpetuate cravings, while increases or decreases in the prefrontal region impair self-regulation (Heilig and Koob, 2010).

The disruption of these neural networks has led to several theoretical frameworks that aim to explain how addiction develops over time. Three of the most prominent frameworks include the allostatic hypothesis (Koob, 2005, 2008, 2010), the habit formation theory (Everitt, 2015, 2016), and impaired response inhibition and salience attribution (Goldstein). Despite differing perspectives, all models converge on deficits in reward processing and the hijacking of reward pathways by addictive substances. This leads to prioritizing drug acquisition over non-drug-related pursuits, where the craving for drugs supersedes other goals that are potentially more adaptive for the afflicted individual.

Koob et al.’s (2010) allostatic hypothesis explores addiction through a psychiatric-motivational lens. It suggests that addiction is mediated by cycles of impulsivity and compulsivity delineated in three stages: binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect, and preoccupation/anticipation (craving), depicting dysregulation across three key functional areas (incentive salience/habits, negative emotional states, and executive function, respectively). This process is influenced by three primary neurocircuitry components (basal ganglia, extended amygdala, and prefrontal cortex, respectively).

The hypothesis describes that it starts with excessive drug consumption during the binge/intoxication phase wherein the three stages interact, gradually becoming more intense. Eventually, it leads to a pathological condition that is recognized as addiction. Abstinence of drug intake triggers acute and prolonged withdrawal symptoms during the withdrawal/negative stage, eliciting a secondary motivational urge through negative reinforcement. Negative reinforcement refers to the strengthening of certain behaviors by removing or avoiding negative stimuli or output. Prolonged periods without substance use involve persisting negative emotions and triggered cravings from cues and surroundings, establishing the basis for the preoccupation/anticipation phase (Koob, 2010). The progression from impulsivity to compulsivity underscores addiction’s complex interplay of psychological and neurological factors, marking a shift from reward-seeking to emotion-alleviating and habitual responses.

Current Treatment Approaches and Limitations

Conventional treatment methods typically involving behavioral therapies and medications, have shown only moderate success rates. Studies suggest that a significant number of individuals, particularly those dealing with substance abuse and gambling disorders, tend to relapse within a year of starting treatment (Hayes).

Although pharmaceutical drugs like methadone and naltrexone have been developed to address addiction by reducing withdrawal symptoms and cravings, these interventions may not fully address the underlying causes of addiction, nor do they offer long-lasting solutions for everyone (Peters). For instance, naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, was tested in a double-blind clinical trial on individuals with alcohol dependence and was found to moderately reduce relapse rates. While it does decrease cravings, it does not increase abstinence (Chick). Similar results were observed in opioid dependence, where naltrexone alone did not lead to a decrease in relapses (Gerra).

The chronic relapsing nature of addiction is a significant challenge for clinicians, with limited options available to maintain abstinence. Even for those who have successfully achieved abstinence, the risk of relapse is always apparent, or it seems to never go away. Koob suggests that chronic use eventually leads to increased sensitivity that triggers emotional processes in such a way that encourages drug-seeking behavior. Stress plays a significant role in this relationship and is considered one of the most challenging aspects to address in addiction treatment. Animal studies suggest the role of dopamine and glutamate neurotransmitters in addiction, but craving is difficult to quantify in clinical settings and has not been shown to correlate with relapses (Koob 2008). Nonetheless, further research is required to expand on the knowledge regarding the biological changes in these stages. Understanding the neurocircuitry involved in the progressive stages of addiction lays the groundwork for exploring molecular, genetic, and neuropharmacological adaptations crucial in vulnerability to both the onset and perpetuation of addiction (Koob 2010).

Exploring Psychedelics and Addiction

There has been a growing interest in using psychedelic-assisted therapy to treat individuals suffering from addiction. Classic psychedelics such as LSD, DMT, and psilocybin have been combined with psychological therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational enhancement therapy (MET). These trials aim to explore the therapeutic potential of psychedelics for various addictions, ranging from alcohol and tobacco to methamphetamine and gambling addiction.

The treatment of addiction leverages the transformative potential of psychedelic drugs when administered in a safe and controlled environment. Early clinical trials and observational studies have shown that psychedelic-assisted therapy sessions can result in notable reductions in substance use, cravings, and relapse rates. Traditional psychedelics may effectively address various addictions, indicating the potential of these substances to target a common underlying mechanism (Yaden).

A pilot study by Bogenschutz (2015) explored the effects of psychedelics on alcohol addiction, particularly with psilocybin. Participants underwent therapy sessions supplemented by psilocybin doses. The results were promising: a significant reduction in drinking days and heavy drinking episodes lasting up to 36 weeks after treatment. Heavy drinking days are defined as when participants consumed more than five drinks for males and more than four drinks for females. The standard drink is settled on 14g alcohol which roughly translates to 130 ml of a glass of red wine or 280 ml of beer. Psilocybin also slashed craving scores by half, offering the potential for long-term recovery. Similar results were suggested in a study of individuals who struggled with tobacco addiction (Johnson, 2014). Psilocybin alongside CBT reported an impressive 80% abstinence rate after six months, far surpassing conventional interventions which contrasts with the typical 35% abstinence rate observed with current therapeutic interventions (Cahill, 2014). 

However, these studies are not entirely met with the scientific rigor of randomized controlled studies. For example, open-label studies cannot establish causality. No significant differences were found between moderate and high doses of psilocybin, indicating gaps in understanding its mechanisms in addiction treatment. However, psilocybin-assisted therapy shows lasting impacts beyond the drug’s immediate effects, with participants reporting higher success in quitting smoking when their experiences were highly significant and spiritually meaningful. These findings suggest a potential role of spirituality and the emotion of awe in the effectiveness of psychedelic therapy. 

For a deeper exploration, a deep dive into the challenges and knowledge gaps in psychedelic research in addiction treatment and recovery will be taken in the second part of the blog. 

In sum, it seems that PAT demonstrates promising outcomes and could offer hope for individuals grappling with addiction. Despite these positive findings, it is important to note that there are still many mysteries in the topic of psychedelics and its potential for treating addiction. As the age-old proverb reverberates within the halls of academia, there is a need for future research so both the efficacy and safety of psychedelics for addiction can be determined.

 

Meet an Expert in the Field: Dr. Zafar

Dr. Zafar, with his extensive background in neuropsychopharmacology and clinical research, is at the forefront of exploring the therapeutic potential of psychedelics in addiction treatment. His work, conducted within the Centre for Psychedelic Research and Neuropsychopharmacology group, is characterized by a multidisciplinary approach that integrates cutting-edge neuroimaging techniques with clinical interventions.

Dr. Zafar’s involvement in psychedelic therapy for addiction extends beyond research. As a senior scientific officer at Drug Science, he contributes to shaping policy and disseminating evidence-based information on medical psychedelics. Through his consulting and advisory services, he is actively engaged in advancing the field of addiction psychiatry and psychopharmacology.

 

 

Are you intrigued by Dr. Zafar’s pioneering work in the realm of psychedelic therapy for addiction? Go to part 2 of this blog, where we delve into the insights gleaned from his past online event, shedding light on the dynamic relationship between addiction and psychedelics. Plus, it is possible to gain access to exclusive online events like the one with Dr. Zafar by becoming a member.

By Gwendolyn Drossaert

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edn. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.
  2. Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A., Wilcox, C. E., Barbosa, P. C., & Strassman, R. J. (2015). Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. Journal of psychopharmacology, 29(3), 289-299.
  3. Cahill, K., Stevens, S., & Lancaster, T. (2014). Pharmacological treatments for smoking cessation. Jama, 311(2), 193-194.
  4. Chick, J., Anton, R., Checinski, K., Croop, R., Drummond, D. C., Farmer, R., … & Ritson, B. (2000). A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence or abuse. Alcohol and alcoholism, 35(6), 587-593.
  5. Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2016). Drug addiction: updating actions to habits to compulsions ten years on. Annual review of psychology, 67, 23-50.
  6. Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2005). Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nature neuroscience, 8(11), 1481-1489.
  7. Gerra, G., Fantoma, A., & Zaimovic, A. (2006). Naltrexone and buprenorphine combination in the treatment of opioid dependence. Journal of psychopharmacology, 20(6), 806-814.
  8. Goldstein, R. Z., & Volkow, N. D. (2011). Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nature reviews neuroscience, 12(11), 652-669.
  9. Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Johnson, M. W., McCann, U. D., & Jesse, R. (2008). Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of psychopharmacology, 22(6), 621-632.
  10. Hayes, A., Herlinger, K., Paterson, L., & Lingford-Hughes, A. (2020). The neurobiology of substance use and addiction: evidence from neuroimaging and relevance to treatment. BJPsych Advances, 26(6), 367-378.
  11. Heilig, M., MacKillop, J., Martinez, D., Rehm, J., Leggio, L., & Vanderschuren, L. J. (2021). Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience. Neuropsychopharmacology, 46(10), 1715-1723.
  12. Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Cosimano, M. P., & Griffiths, R. R. (2014). Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Journal of psychopharmacology, 28(11), 983-992.
  13. Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., & Griffiths, R. R. (2017). Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 43(1), 55-60.
  14. Kang, M., Mackay, L., Christie, D., Callon, C., & Argento, E. (2022). Can psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy play a role in enhancing motivation to change in addiction treatment settings?. Journal of Psychedelic Studies.
  15. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008). Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 29-53.
  16. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2005). Plasticity of reward neurocircuitry and the’dark side’of drug addiction. Nature neuroscience, 8(11), 1442-1444.
  17. Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2010). Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 217-238.
  18. LADIS Tussenrapportage Kerncijfers Verslavingszorg 2016-2021, IVZ (2023) see link: https://cdn.bluenotion.nl/209c705755afb5baca6501d22c0ddc6e05c586540b8868fe813b7a1b3cb76695.pdf 
  19. Peters, J., & Olson, D. E. (2021). Engineering safer psychedelics for treating addiction. Neuroscience Insights, 16, 26331055211033847.
  20. Ritchie, H., Arriagada, P., & Roser, M. (2022). Opioids, cocaine, cannabis and other illicit drugs. Our World in Data.
  21. World Drug Report 2022: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2022.html 
  22. Yaden, D. B., Berghella, A. P., Regier, P. S., Garcia-Romeu, A., Johnson, M. W., & Hendricks, P. S. (2021). Classic psychedelics in the treatment of substance use disorder: potential synergies with twelve-step programs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 98, 103380.
  23. Zafar, R., Siegel, M., Harding, R., Barba, T., Agnorelli, C., Suseelan, S., … & Erritzoe, D. (2023). Psychedelic therapy in the treatment of addiction: the past, present and future. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1183740.

Dutch Minister Pia Dijkstra to Open Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelic Research

pia dijkstra dutch minister of healthcare

Dutch Minister Pia Dijkstra to Open Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelic Research

The Dutch minister of Medical Care, Pia Dijkstra (D66), will inaugurate the sixth edition of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelic Research (ICPR) on June 6th. We are excited about the growing support by the Dutch government for psychedelic-assisted therapy, a field gaining significant momentum across Europe.

pia dijkstra dutch minister of healthcare

Previously held by Ernst Kuipers, the role of Minister of Medical Care has passed to Dijkstra, who continues the support for research into the therapeutic potential of psychedelics.

Under Kuipers, the Dutch government had already shown a commitment to leading in this innovative area. Kuipers stated that the Netherlands should be at the forefront of psychedelic research.  He also contributed to a report commissioned by the Dutch research funding organisation ZonMw that offered a first glimpse of the potential psychedelic research landscape in the Netherlands. Lastly, he allocated 1.6 million euros of funding to psychedelic research.

 

The shift in leadership, while maintaining support for psychedelic research, underscores a broader acceptance and interest in psychedelic research among politicians, thanks to increasing evidence of its effectiveness. The upcoming ICPR and Pathways to Access Summit promises to further explore these possibilities, continuing the Netherlands’ influential role in this important field of medicine.

For more insights into psychedelic-assisted therapy and the critical perspective of OPEN’s director Joost Breeksema & Ernst Kuipers, check out the video below. (DUTCH)

EUROPEAN SUPPORT

You might wonder whether this support for psychedelic-assisted therapy is only reserved to the small and progressive country of the Netherlands. But this is certainly not the case. In the past year, support has been gaining momentum and is expanding towards the scale of European support. 

Recently, Joost Breeksema, the executive director of the OPEN Foundation chaired the meeting at the European Parliament to launch PsyPal – a 6.5 million EU-funded multi-site research consortium with over 19 different partners, including OPEN Foundation, that seeks to alleviate suffering from existential distress in patients with a incurable illness through the use of psilocybin.

Only a few days later, Breeksema participated in a two-day workshop at the European Medicines Agency to explore the views of stakeholders and experts on the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, providing further clarity on defining the safe and effective use of psychedelics, informing on regulatory challenges associated with the development and evaluation of psychedelic medicines, and defining areas for which further regulatory guidance is required.

towards safe and responsible integration of psychedelic-assisted therapy

As thrilling as it is to witness the rapidly increasing support for psychedelic-assisted therapy, a critical perspective and patience are the keys to shaping a future where psychedelic therapy can be integrated safely and responsibly for the benefit of science, healthcare and society.

For the moment, we look forward to welcoming you to the sixth edition of ICPR, which will be held from June 6 to June 8 at the PHIL in Haarlem, the Netherlands.

co-create the future pathways to access in Europe

The full-day Pathways to Access Summit (Paths) convenes key stakeholders from Europe and beyond to explore the opportunities and challenges around the development, approval, and eventual integration of psychedelic medicines into mainstream European health care. Join us in co-creating the future of psychedelic medicine.

Rick Strassman: At the forefront of DMT research

Rick Strassman: At the forefront of DMT research

Touching on some chapters of the life and work of Dr. Strassman, from his academic pursuit with psychedelic substances to his profound insights into the innovative therapeutic models of DMT administration
Author: Simon Jost

Meet Rick Strassman

 

 

Join us for an exciting Q&A session with Dr. Rick Strassman, where we’ll delve into the fascinating realms of consciousness exploration, psychedelic research, and innovative DMT trials. Gain exclusive insights into Dr. Strassman’s groundbreaking work and have your burning questions answered live. Can’t make it? Don’t worry! The recording will be accessible to all members of our open community. Reserve your spot now by clicking here and embark on a journey of discovery with one of the foremost pioneers in psychedelic research.

 

Author of DMT – The spirit molecule & The Psychedelic Handbook

We are honoured to delve into the realms of consciousness exploration, clinical psychedelic research and innovative DMT trials together with the author and psychiatrist Dr Rick Strassman. Most people will associate his name with his bestselling publications, such as “DMT – The Spirit Molecule: A Doctor’s Revolutionary Research Into the Biology of Near-Death and Mystical Experiences”, and “The Psychedelic Handbook: A Practical Guide to Psilocybin, LSD, Ketamine, MDMA, and Ayahuasca”. 

In this blog, we’ll touch on some chapters of the life and work of Dr. Strassman, from his academic pursuit with psychedelic substances to his profound insights into the innovative therapeutic models of DMT administration. Ultimately, the following article aims to introduce you to some of Dr Strassman’s earlier and current work with a special focus on N,N Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), the active component of ayahuasca. If you’re eager for further insights and have burning questions for Dr. Strassman, don’t miss the chance to participate in our upcoming online Q&A session. 

Disclaimer: 

This blog post is not dedicated to providing an exhaustive and elaborate description of Strassman’s biography, but rather aims to shed light on some of his important scientific endeavours, and spiritual journeys to prepare and facilitate an interesting OPEN Q&A session with Rick Strassman!

Dr. Strassmans Background and Earlier Career

Strassman’s journey begins in 1952 in the vibrant city of Los Angeles, California. His academic background started with his undergraduate studies in zoology at Pomona College in Claremont California, after which he transferred to Stanford University. Soon after in 1973, he graduated with departmental honors in biological sciences. 

The next chapter of Dr Strassman’s journey unfolded at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University in the Bronx, New York, where he obtained his medical degree with honours in 1977. This pivotal moment set the stage for a career that would seamlessly blend academic rigour with spiritual exploration and scientific inquiry.

Continuing his career at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, he completed his general psychiatry residency, earning acclaim with the prestigious Sandoz Award for outstanding graduating resident in 1981. His subsequent work took him to the rugged landscapes of Fairbanks, Alaska, and the vibrant community of Albuquerque, New Mexico, where his research group were the first to document the role of melatonin in humans. Melatonin is secreted by the pineal gland in the human brain and plays an important role in sleep by setting and regulating the inner human clock (scientifically referred to as the circadian rhythm). Publically, his work is sometimes reduced to his important role as an author and his involvement in the first DMT research after the “War on Drugs”. However, it is important to understand Strassman’s early work because it played an important role in pursuing his future endeavours. Consequently, before zooming in on his work with psychedelics, I will briefly dedicate the next paragraph to acquaint you with some of his experience, study and practice in the world of religion and spirituality.

Religious and Spiritual Journey

Beyond academia, Dr. Strassman’s journey took him on a deeply personal and spiritual odyssey. He grew up in a Conservative Jewish home and underwent his bar mitzvah ritual. Following this, he ceased any formal affiliation or study within Judaism. His spiritual journey therefore begins with the practice of transcendental meditation during college. Located on the West Coast during the ’60s and early ’70s, Strassman was fortunate to be at the right place at the right time for taking a deep dive into the world of mindfulness meditation, Eastern religions and psychedelics. 

Several years after his initial college experience with meditation, the psychiatrist commenced the deeper study and practice of Soto Zen Buddhism under the supervision and guidance of a Western Zen order. This practice was rewarded by receiving the Jukai (Lay Ordination). Eventually, he was administrating and guiding a lay Buddhist meditation group from the same order. His interest in consciousness exploration, spirituality and religion led him to the study of the Hebrew bible. In his bestselling book “DMT – The Spirit Molecule: A Doctor’s Revolutionary Research Into the Biology of Near-Death and Mystical Experiences” he dives deeper into the intimate connection between spirituality, consciousness, spirituality and DMT. 

Photo by Marek Piwnicki, unsplash.com

 

Psychedelic Research inspired by Eastern religion

Inspired by his interest in Eastern religion, meditation practices and research expertise, he began his scientific endeavour with psychedelic substances and spirituality (more about his spiritual practices later). In an interview for “Medium”, he emphasised that it was the qualitative and descriptive overlap of psychedelic experiences and Eastern meditation practices that further nurtured his pursuit on attending a career in the field of psychedelic research. 

As mentioned before, Strassmans earlier work focuses on the role of the pineal gland and melatonin in the human and mammalian brain. Interestingly, the pineal gland is often considered the “seat of the soul” in many religious and spiritual communities, with its significance dating far back to the times of the early Egyptians. 

Eventually, based on evidence from Strassman and other researchers, it has been shown that the pineal gland can produce endogenous DMT, potentially accounting for profound experiences, such as birth and near-death experiences (Dean et al., 2019). Ultimately, the interplay of rigorous spiritual and religious exploration, combined with his earlier scientific work, Strassman’s curiosity paved a road that led him to become an important figure in early and current DMT research. 

After the “war on drugs” and the associated pause of psychedelic research, Dr. Strassman was involved in conducting the first government-approved human experiments of psychedelic substances in the ’90s, with a special focus on the safety and psychopharmacology of DMT. While his earlier publications were often dedicated to the fundamental mechanism, safety and pharmacology of the drugs in a healthy population, his more recent research specified in exploring the therapeutic potential of DMT in stroke rehabilitation. Within this realm, Dr Strassman was and is involved in the investigation of prolonged intravenous infusions of DMT. 

 

Prolonged DMT IV-Infusions

For the psychedelic-drug-educated reader, this sub-heading may come surprising, as serotonergic hallucinogenic drugs are usually accompanied by tolerance and cross-tolerance effects. However, as Rick Strassman describes in an interview with “Drug Discovery & Development”, in the early 90s his research team observed that one can repeatedly dose DMT without inducing tolerance. Being a researcher at heart, the psychiatrist sought and received funding from the NIH to investigate the tolerance effects of repeated DMT dosing in an experimental setting. In their research, they administered the psychedelic every 30 minutes four times and surprisingly did not note any tolerance effects. Consequently, the idea was planted that DMT may be induced as a prolonged intravenous infusion, rather than the more common method of smoking or intravenous bolus injections. 

According to Strassman, this may be an interesting, innovative psychotherapy model for exploring the psychological, pharmacological and therapeutic effects of DMT in humans. While it is difficult to stop a full-blown psychedelic experience after a moderate to large bolus injection (one-time dosing) of magic mushrooms or LSD, one can vary the IV infusion rate of DMT to alter the strength of the experience. Once the IV infusion is stopped, the psychedelic experience will be over after a few minutes. 

During his interview at Drug Discovery & Development, Dr Strassman shared insights into ongoing research at UCLA, where repeated dosing of DMT is being explored as a potential treatment for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This novel approach involves administering a substantial dose of DMT followed by periods of processing, allowing individuals to delve into their experiences over several hours. Continuous dosing, compared to one-time dosing offers clinicians the control to induce periods of rest and processing by reducing the infusion rate of the substance.

Additionally, results from the publication with Dr. Gallimore about the pharmacological effects of continuous dosing, this form of DMT administration may offer the opportunity to carefully characterize the subjective effects of the psychedelic compound. Furthermore, this protocol allows for a more controlled testing opportunity to use brain-imaging technologies to study the psychoneuropharmacological effects of the compound. 

Conclusion

In closing, Dr. Rick Strassman’s pioneering work in consciousness exploration and psychedelic research offers a glimpse into the potential of these substances for therapeutic purposes. From his early studies on the pineal gland to his current investigations into prolonged DMT infusion, his journey underscores the profound connections between science, spirituality, and healing. As we continue to delve deeper into the mysteries of the mind, Dr. Strassman’s insights serve as a guiding light, illuminating new pathways for understanding and growth.

 

Are you curious about this topic or want to ask Rick Strassman a few questions? Join our upcoming online event! 

By Simon Jost 

BEYOND SUBSTANCES: WHEN CULTURE GOES INTO THE LAB

mystic-experiences-or-self-knowledge
Photo by By Andre Vas

BEYOND psychedelic SUBSTANCES: WHEN CULTURE enters THE LAB

Brendan Borrell’s recently published New York Times article The Psychedelic Evangelist, about Johns Hopkins University’s late pioneering researcher Roland Griffiths, joins a series of blog posts, news articles and academic papers discussing problematic aspects of psychedelic science. Some of these concern personal misconduct, but others are rooted much deeper. Psychedelics bring together human psychology and chemical compounds, science, metaphysics and cultures. They are explored by pharmacologists and philosophers, anthropologists and psychiatrists, all trying to study what’s in a psychedelic, each with their own vocabulary and worldview. Some of the problems which arise from psychedelic research represent old schisms between the sciences and the humanities, and questions about knowledge as a whole. Here too, psychedelics seem to have a revealing effect, exposing our own thinking mechanisms.

Mystical science

The concept of “mystical experiences” has been one of these subjects of ongoing discussion. According to the Cartesian view, the spiritual and the experiential are in principle beyond the bounds of science, as they can neither be confirmed nor refuted. Thus uncomfortable feelings around their appearance in scientific articles can be easily understood. In The Language of Metaphysical Experience, Alan Watts relates to a similar problem encountered by physics in relation to unknown fundamental entities. While these cannot be explained and remain mysterious, they can be related to in quantitative terms for prediction purposes. For example, we can say that “dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter-energy composition of the universe“ without knowing what ‘dark matter’ is. In the same way, we can put ‘mystical experiences’ on a scale, and measure how many subjects experienced them, their level of intensity and so forth. Even if such information enables prediction, ontologically such statements remain meaningless, or as Alan Watts puts it: “By admitting a few numbers, even ‘Jabberwocky’ may become scientific”.

‘Mystical’ is surely an eye-catcher, but psychedelic literature is abundant with what Bateson called “heuristic concepts”: concepts which bring to the table more fog than clarity. Consider for example ‘connectedness’, ‘awe’, ‘oneness’, ‘ego-death’, ‘oceanic boundlessness’, or even basic terms like ‘mind’ and ‘consciousness’. Do we really know what they mean? Humanities scholars thoroughly discuss and contextualize such terms, like the mystical in religion studies or awe in art and philosophy. As they travel to the hard sciences and find themselves in quantitative questionnaires, they can become inaccurate and biased.

These are differences within disciplines in our own culture; stepping outside reveals a deeper abyss, but it could also help in bridging gaps. In the same essay, Watts elaborates on differences between Western and Asian conceptualizations of metaphysics and their purposes. In the West we see metaphysical statements as conveying positive information about Reality. In Asia they are treated as remedies to frustrating human psychological ‘unreal’ problems, while Reality itself is ineffable. There is indeed something paradoxical about using objective terms and methods like observation to understand a subjective phenomenon like the psychedelic experience. There is a constant need to find less subjective terms: from ‘bad trip’ to ‘negative’, ‘adverse’, ‘challenging’ experience. The latter may sound more scientific than hippy, but aren’t they all personal value judgements of subjective experiences? Do they tell us anything objective at all? Another example is the quest to compile THE playlist for psychedelic interventions. Can there be one or even multiple recommended playlists? Is music not a matter of personal taste, memories and associations, of cultural references and education?

Experiencing objectivity

Some of the challenges are anchored in psychedelics’ legal status as schedule I drugs and the wish to develop them into treatments for medical conditions. Here too, our web of ontological assumptions and scientific methods keeps getting entangled, sometimes creating dangerous traps. Trying to stay as objective as possible, we wish to minimize the “human element” in order to properly assess the efficacy of substances. We use blinding and placebo-controlled trials, but this very practice sometimes leads to a nocebo effect (worsening of symptoms due to not getting the treatment) and even death, as described in the New York Times’s article. In many cases, practices applied to enhance objectivity are reinterpreted by participants as cold or unempathetic, and thus end up influencing results. For example, in order to minimize bias, the FDA recommends that a trial’s in-session monitor would not be involved in post-session psychotherapy. The assumption is that a therapist may be biased, in the sense that they know what happened during the psychedelic session and may use this information later. For participants, this means there is no continuity between the psychedelic session and the integration part (if there is one). This, in turn, creates trust issues and makes it difficult for participants to let go and to share their experiences. Since the therapy element is so determinate and hard to measure, psychotherapy and psychological support are often minimized in trials (also due to financial reasons), raising ethical concerns and undermining potential benefits. So some of the measures taken to accurately determine the safety and efficacy of psychedelics are in themselves a detriment to the safety and effectiveness of trials.

Medicalization as a goal has received much critique. Different approaches, as manifested by indigenous cultures or even by counterculture are often regarded as less or not at all valid. But even within mainstream culture, and within medicine and psychiatry, psychedelics raise some thoughts about the very definitions of mental illness, health and well-being. Here are a few: how come psychedelics seem to work for so many different mental disorders? Could it be that the terms “placebo” and “inner healing” refer to the same thing? If placebo works so well, why do we focus on external solutions which would prove better, instead of trying to enhance placebo? Some say that psychedelic research is leading to a full-blown paradigm shift in psychiatry, integrating social and cultural factors into conceptualizations of mental disorders and to transformation as the new basis for psychiatry.

Wired by culture

Known since the beginning of the 1960’s, ‘Set and Setting’ is the main mechanism through which subjectivity and culture enter the psychedelic experience. Indeed, many academic papers include an apologetic paragraph acknowledging the importance of these two illusive and immeasurable components, before embarking on a futile battle to neutralize them. 

Originally referring to a person’s mind-set and environment during a trip, set and setting bring into the psychedelic experience a complex web of one’s personal history, tendencies, mood, culture, environment and education. And all of these together influence participants’ interpretations, the meanings they give to their own experiences. In 1997, Betty Eisner added the Matrix component, one’s broader cultural frame. Then, in American Trip, Ido Hartogsohn expanded it to a Collective Set and Setting of a nation with its particular history and sociocultural context. Our Collective Set and Setting influences not only participants, but researchers and therapists as well. It can include, for example, the infamous hype of the psychedelic renaissance, articles we’ve read, films and documentaries we watched, stories and images from the 1960’s counterculture and echoes from the “War on drugs”. Back in 1959, Anthony F.C. Wallace already attributed the discrepancy seen between reactions to mescaline of Westerners and indigenous people to their cultural beliefs. While white subjects reported ‘going mad’ (e.g. mood swings, losing touch with reality, forsaking social inhibitors, etc.), such phenomena were not felt by the indigenous group, who remained generally stable and positive. Wallace concluded that the differences stemmed from the cultural conceptualization of hallucinations. In Western psychiatry, hallucinations are perceived as signs of mental illness, while in the indigenous culture, they are considered normal and even desirable.

Several elements in the setting of Griffiths’ lab were deemed problematic by Dr. Richards. It is easy to see how participants’ interpretations and experiences may be affected by a Buddha sculpture. But in fact, a ‘neutral’ setting does not exist. A hospital building carries its own associations, the outside and inside appearance of clinics also matters. According to Art literature, even white walls are not neutral. Music, smells… There is no way out; everything matters, from the size of the room and type of furniture through the number and gender of people present, to perceptions and beliefs of researchers, therapists and participants about psychedelics, people and the world. Moreover, not only do they affect trial results, but also their design, our research questions and our approach to the process. For example, a study aimed at minimizing nausea during consumption of Ayahuasca treats it as an undesired side effect, while another can regard it as an act of cleansing conducive to positive changes in well-being. Simply put, Set and Setting cannot be kept away from the lab.

Psychedelic research is full of contradictions, paradoxes and absurdities. We strive for total control and meticulous procedures to study substances which make one lose control and reflect on your own processes. We wish to eliminate anything weird or mysterious, but also dream of discovering a “magic pill”. As meanings, chemicals, cultures and personal tendencies collide, interdisciplinary research can supply the necessary means – perhaps not to overcome all contradictions – but at least to understand them better and to live with them as best as we can.

By Annabelle Abraham

Beyond Physics: Exploring Consciousness with Bernardo Kastrup’s Analytical Idealism

Picture1
Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash

Beyond Physics: Exploring Consciousness with Bernardo Kastrup's Analytical Idealism

Introducing the philosophical theory of analytical idealism according to Bernardo Kastrup. Author: Simon Jost

“Life is the extrinsic appearance of a dissociative process in a universal consciousness.” -Bernardo Kastrup

Meet Bernardo Kastrup

 

bernardo kastrup live online event with question and answer
Recording will become available to OPEN members

 

Are you ready to flip the script of reality and dive deep into a world that is purely mental and not so much physical? Meet the founder of Essentia Foundation , PhD. Bernardo Kastrup.  Blending neuroscience and philosophy, his captivating ideas are embedded in the concept of analytical idealism. Brace yourself for a mind-bending journey beyond the confines of conventional thought. Join Bernado for his upcoming call at OPEN Foundation ! The next lines aim to give you a general understanding of his ideas about the reality of the mind and eventually bridge analytical idealism with psychedelic experiences.

Does our perception align with reality?

Let’s start by taking your eyes away from the screen and observing what you perceive in the world around you. The wall in your room, the trees in the park, the clouds in the sky or the sounds of the birds. Intuitively, we believe that what we perceive accurately reflects the world outside of us – a mirrored image of the external world in our consciousness.

If this were true – we would have a fully transparent window into the world outside – we would all drown in what the analytical idealist Bernardo Kastrup calls “an entropic soup”.  To understand that metaphor it is important to grasp the general concept of entropy.

What is Entropy?

Entropy is a fundamental concept in thermodynamics that is often described as the measure of randomness or disorder of a system. Imagine a brand new deck of cards that has never been shuffled. This represents low entropy because there is not a lot of randomness. Now think about shuffling this deck of cards. We created a high entropic state that is not very organized but rather chaotic. Let us keep this concept in mind when we dive deeper into the concept of analytical idealism.

“The entropic soup”:  the world looks nothing like what we perceive

From the perspective of “the entropic soup”, the world around us is highly entropic because it’s full of complexity, randomness, and disorder. Think about all the diverse and chaotic phenomena we encounter every day: from the unpredictable weather patterns to the bustling traffic on city streets, to the entangled interactions of living organisms in highly complex ecosystems. According to the second law of thermodynamics, if we perceive the world as it is, including the immense chaos and disorder, our brains would all drown in a hot, entropic soup. Consequently, through evolution, our brains learn to make sense of the world by using a simplified “user interface” or a “dashboard” that can help us navigate and make sense of a highly chaotic environment. Like a dashboard in a pilot’s cockpit that depicts the wind strength by representing it on a dial with an arrow (see picture below). The dial does not show the wind itself but is rather a representation of the wind. Bernardo states that “the world in itself looks nothing like what we perceive. We are merely using a virtual user interface to make sense of the chaos outside. More about that later. First, we will investigate mainstream ideas of consciousness and the world.

Pilot making sense of the world with the help of a dashboard.

Foto by William Topa, unsplash

 

The limitation of physicalism: The hard problem of consciousness

According to physicalism, all there is can be described in quantities. Physical relations and matter are the basis of everything. Therefore, the reality of the mind and the world itself – in the eyes of a physicalist  – can be fully explained by abstract quantitative mathematical relationships. Hence, the mind including all of its rich qualities, such as the experience of rain on your skin or the smell of freshly baked cookies, is caused by physical brain activity.   

However, Bernado Kastup does not agree with this view and states “There is something very wrong with this story that brain activity generates conscious experience.” Indeed, cognitive neuroscientists have still not solved the “hard problem of consciousness” (as defined by David Chalmers). The question remains how can a purely quantitative, physical entity give rise to complex qualitative experiences?

Bernardo suggests we imagine a scenario where a scientist has all the knowledge about the brain’s structure, its neurons, and how they interact. They know everything about brain activity when a person sees the colour red – the firing of neurons, the release of chemicals, and so on. However, no matter how much they understand about the brain’s physical processes, they still can’t explain why seeing the color red feels the way it does to the person experiencing it. This inability to explain subjective experience purely in terms of physical processes is what constitutes the hard problem of consciousness.

Perhaps it is necessary to shift our world paradigm to allow answers to this problem. One proposed solution may be Bernardo Kastrup’s analytical idealism.

What is analytical idealism?

Contrary to physicalism, in the philosophical perspective of idealism, reality is fundamentally mental or dependent on consciousness. In other words, the external world and its phenomena are products of mental constructs or perceptions. Similarly, analytical idealism is embedded in idealism and posits that the essence of the universe is an “intrinsic view”, suggesting that reality fundamentally resides in subjective experience. Analytical Idealism  is rooted in and driven by post-enlightenment principles such as conceptual parsimony, coherence, internal logical coherence, explanatory capability, and empirical sufficiency.

How does analytical idealism explain consciousness and reality?

While physicalism states that brain activity causes experience, analytical idealism argues that brain activity is just the depiction of experience. To understand Kastrup’s argument, one needs to take a few steps back and briefly review the basic assumptions that analytical idealism is based on.

Kastrup emphasizes that there are three empirical givens that we can be fully certain about:

 1) There is experience.

Before we start to theorize, all we have is experience.  

2) Brain function is a perceptual experience

For example, a neurologist who perceives the image created with a brain scanner.

3) The brain is made of what we colloquially call and perceive as “matter”.

Importantly, whatever we call matter, whatever it is, it underlies both the brain and the universe and thus creates space for a kinship between them. 

Building on these statements, analytical idealism states that brain function is what one’s inner conscious life looks like when it is observed by a neuroscientist through a brain scanner. Consequently, Bernardo Kastrup emphasizes that brain function does not generate a conscious inner life, because this leads to the “hard problem of consciousness”. Rather, he elaborates that conscious inner life is intrinsic; it is the essence that can be observed from an outside perspective with the help of a brain scanner. In other words, a brain scan is merely the representation of conscious inner life, but it is not consciousness itself.

The universal consciousness with multiple personalities

Bernardo Kastrup’s analytical idealism conceptualizes and builds upon one universal consciousness. To introduce this idea, the philosopher often uses the analogy of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). DID is a psychiatric condition that involves the presence of two or more distinct personality states (also known as “alters”) within the same individual. Using this analogy, he argues that we are dissociated alters of universal consciousness. Because of dissociation, we believe to be individual minds. With that being stated, all that lies beyond our dissociative boundary constitutes a broader “universal consciousness” and thus is mental by itself.

How do we make sense of the world according to analytical idealism?

One important concept in the theory of analytical idealism is “impingement”. Imagine you had a stressful fight with your housemate, partner or friend just before work. During work, you have to function, which is why your mind automatically compartmentalizes the stressful event and “parks it” to set it aside. According to Kastrup, this is a kind of “deliberate light dissociation. Your mind as a whole did not stop to feel the emotions, they are just more in the background, dissociated from your executive ego. However, you notice that you are easily irritable or disorganized during your work. The stressful event can still influence the ego despite the creation of a dissociative boundary. In other words, the mind outside of the boundary impinges across the dissociative boundary on the ego within.

What happens outside of our dissociative boundary are ideas and emotions that impinge on our mental dissociative boundary and result in us perceiving the world outside. Kastrup explains that the dissociative boundary “forms a screen on which outside mentation impinges, or is projected as perceptions”.

The dashboard in the pilot’s cockpit is the extrinsic appearance of the world outside as represented by dials measuring wind, temperature, etc. Similarly, the “perception is the extrinsic appearance, as represented in an alter`s dashboard of dials, of the ideas and emotions in universal consciousness”.

Model displaying how we are all dissociated alters with dissociative boundaries of a larger, shared universal consciousness.

Created with biorender.

How do neural correlates of psychedelics substantiate the argument of analytical idealism?

Psychedelic experiences are often perceived as one of the most profound experiences of a user’s life. People often report that psychedelics induce a rich altered state of consciousness with enhanced senses and deep insights. Interestingly, the intense psychedelic experience does not correlate with increased brain activity, but neuroscientists show that rather the opposite holds! Psychedelics reduce overall brain activity. Especially, from the perspective of physicalism this is surprising. The argument of physicalism assumes that brain activation is the cause of subjective experience, so how is it possible that lower brain activity can give space for an enriched experience?

Psychedelics reduce dissociation and increase entropy

Kastrup explains that the reduced brain activity, induced by psychedelic substances, represents reduced dissociation. In other words, brain activity measured by brain scans is a picture of this dissociation process. Psychedelics reduce dissociation which correlates with a richer, more intense and profound experience due to the alleviation of dissociation itself. By reduction of dissociation, the dissociative boundary becomes more permeable, which allows the transpassing of elements from beyond the boundary to reach the alter within. We experience trance, the trespassing of mental elements across dissociative boundaries, while our brain activity is largely reduced.

Model displaying that psychedelics (here psilocybin-containing mushrooms) can make the dissociative boundary more permeable.

Perhaps, as Kastrup suggests, the increased connection to the world outside and other people, as perceived during a psychedelic experience may reflect the reduction of dissociation, which brings us closer to “universal consciousness” and the other alters by allowing the crossing of mental entities from beyond the boundary that surrounds our alter.

Bernardo argues that the end of life is the end of the dissociative process. By reducing dissociation we may get into a similar state like death. If psychedelics reduce dissociation, this should elicit an experience similar to death. Indeed, psychedelics can induce the experience of “ego death”  (dissolution of the sense of self) and have been found to share similarities with near-death experiences, which is consistent with Kastrups theory. This observation may further substantiate this theory.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Bernardo Kastrup’s analytical idealism presents a thought-provoking perspective on the nature of reality and consciousness. By challenging the traditional paradigms of physicalism (and others), Kastrup offers a framework where consciousness is not merely an emergent property of brain activity but is fundamental to the fabric of existence. Through concepts like dissociation and impingement, he elucidates how our perception of the world is shaped by our mental processes, bridging neuroscience with philosophy. Furthermore, Kastrup’s exploration of psychedelic experiences provides intriguing insights into the relationship between consciousness, brain function, and the dissolution of ego boundaries. Overall, Kastrup’s ideas invite us to reconsider our understanding of reality, consciousness, and the interconnectedness of the universe in a manner that transcends conventional thought.

Are you curious about this topic or want to ask Bernardo Kastrup a few questions? Join our upcoming online event that will go into depth about analytical idealism! 

By Simon Jost 

Better sex beyond the trip: Enhanced sexual functioning months after a psychedelic experience

casey-horner-JIdmuiF9luY-unsplash
Casey Horner; Unsplash

BETTER SEX BEYOND THE TRIP: ENHANCED SEXUAL FUNCTIONING MONTHS AFTER A PSYCHEDELIC EXPERIENCE​

“This study shines yet more light on the far-reaching effects of psychedelics on an array of psychological functioning”

Introduction

What substances come to your mind if you think about sexual enhancement? Viagra? Alcohol? Amphetamines? Maybe over-the-counter natural products like Gingo Bilboa? 

Many psychonauts and plenty of anecdotes describe that altered states of consciousness – induced by psychedelics, such as psilocybin (the active component of magic mushroom), LSD, or  5-meo DMT – can foster an intimate, novel and magical sexual experience. But is there also evidence for positive effects on sexual functioning that outlast the drug experience and carry over into the sober, everyday life?

In the recent Nature publication, first author Tommaso Barba – who was recently a guest speaker at OPEN foundation – together with a research group from Imperial College London, suggest that psychedelics may enhance sexual functioning for up to 6 months after a trip! Tommaso believes that “this is the first scientific study to explore the effects of psychedelics on sexual functioning”.  Importantly, the researchers emphasize that their study does not cover “drug-sex” (sex during a trip), but rather captures the long-term effects of psychedelic experiences and psychedelic-assisted therapy that outlasts their pharmacological effect by far. In other words, the aim was to explore and understand differences in sexual functioning weeks and months after one experienced a psychedelic trip.

‘As I sit silent, away from you, you come into my mind. Caressing me gently with your limitless body. Stroking my heart with soft sand, holding my hand. Unwinding my mind, intertwining to the divine, into the forest we slip, deep, dark, unknown guided by light, you gently lead me to the unfolding lotus. Kissing me with blue petals of love. 

– EROWID experience report of an LSD user with her partner 

Who were the participants?

The research group combined responses of almost 300 participants derived from two different studies. The first study recruited participants who already planned to explore psychedelics (such as ayahuasca, 5 meo DMT, psilocybin or LSD) recreationally or in a ceremony. Via an online survey, 261 people answered questions before their psychedelic experience, then four weeks and six months after. 

The second study reflects answers from 59 participants who were part of a clinical depression trial led by Professor Robin Carhart-Harris and aimed to assess the differences in efficacy between the antidepressant drug escitalopram (an SSRI) and psilocybin (the active component in magic mushrooms).

What results are indicated by the study?

Results of the study demonstrate sexual improvements for up to 6 months after the study! Improvements cover various dimensions of sexual functioning, such as the pleasure of sex, sexual arousal, attraction to their partner, acceptance of their own physical appearance, interpersonal communication, and a sense of spirituality related to sex. Neither of the two studies noted a change in the perceived importance of sex.

While both psilocybin and escitalopram decreased depressive symptoms equally well, the present study demonstrates that, compared to the psilocybin group, the antidepressant escitalopram is not related to sexual improvements, but rather worsening. Furthermore, half of the patients in the escitalopram group reported sexual dysfunction, compared to only 13% in the psilocybin group. This is huge because it highlights an important difference between the two substances and can indicate further research directions and hint at novel therapeutic applications.

How do the researchers explain these long-lasting effects of psychedelics on sexual functioning?

The most commonly reported lasting positive effects of psychedelic experiences usually involve higher openness (how curious you are to explore new experiences), connectedness (with yourself and to others), and elevated mindfulness (how present and aware you are in and of the current moment).

openness

An open state of mind after psychedelics may explain why participants reported exploring new sexual experiences more often after experiencing a trip. This in turn has been shown to increase perceived sexual functioning. The authors write that it is beneficial to maintain “a mindful and open state of mind for attaining a satisfactory sexual performance”.

connectedness

There is no question that psychedelics can produce lasting perceptions of connectedness. Feeling more connected psychologically, emotionally or physically to yourself or others enhances interpersonal intimacy and fosters a sense of comfort that ultimately improves the sexual experience.

mindfulness

Experiencing the moment, tuning in to one’s senses and being aware of one’s surroundings are all positive outcomes of higher mindfulness. Not only meditation but also psychedelics can increase mindfulness for a long time after a trip. Researchers suggest that mindfulness is important for one’s sexual performance and the satisfaction of the sexual experience.

brain changes

Brain researchers and psychologists suggest that psychedelic-assisted therapy may help patients relieve certain mental barriers and overthinking patterns by lowering the activity of certain brain networks that are involved in excessive self-directed attention. This is especially useful for people who suffer from excessive overthinking and rumination – as observed in depression.

spirituality

You may wonder what spirituality has to do with sexual performance. Spirituality almost functions as a combination of all the abovementioned factors. Spiritual individuals – and psychedelic users – often experience the “transcendence of the ego”. This shift away from self-centeredness can reduce performance pressure and self-consciousness during sexual activity, allowing for a more natural and fulfilling experience. Additionally, spirituality often brings about greater mindfulness, a willingness to embrace new experiences, and an elevated sense of well-being.

Why are these findings so important?

As the first author Tommaso Barba explains “On the surface, this type of research may seem ‘quirky’, but the psychological aspects of sexual function – including how we think about our bodies, our attraction to our partners, and our ability to connect to people intimately – are all important to psychological wellbeing in sexually active adults”. The relevance of healthy sexual functioning goes way beyond the satisfaction, pleasure and arousal one experiences before, during and after sex. Couple therapists often stress the importance of both sexual performance and the perception of one’s sex life, underscoring their pivotal role in nurturing a healthy and fulfilling relationship. 

Often psychiatric disorders are accompanied by reoccurring issues with sexual functioning. For example, individuals with depression often report anhedonia (the loss of experiencing pleasure), lower self-esteem, and struggle to accept and be satisfied with their physical appearance. These psychological constructs are central to healthy sexual functioning – psychologically and physically. Some therapists even suggest that impaired sexual functioning may be a central risk factor for some individuals to develop a behavioural disorder, such as depression or anxiety.

Patients who are treated with antidepressants often complain about sexual dysfunction. The results from this study may help to identify sub-populations that may benefit more from a psychedelic intervention. For example, sexually active individuals who suffer from depression with comorbid sexual dysfunction (or vice versa!) may benefit more from a psychedelic-assisted intervention compared to antidepressants (SSRIs). 

What are some pitfalls of these findings?

While all of these results are very exciting and illuminate the variety of positive effects psychedelics may induce, it is extremely important to maintain a critical mindset. Therefore, the following lines will reflect some of the pitfalls of the study and explain why we need more research to confirm and apply these findings.  

Even though the study integrated two different study groups (naturalistic users and participants in a clinical trial), the participants’ demographic background primarily reflects white, well-educated and heterosexual people. Secondly, the measurement of sexual dysfunction relied on self-report, which means that the improvements are derived from subjective opinions. Adding to that, the study did not include the evaluation of the sexual functioning of the (sexual) partners – hence, solely relying on one side self-report.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study sheds light on the potential long-lasting benefits of psychedelics on sexual functioning, extending beyond the immediate drug experience. Despite being preliminary and not free of limitations, the findings underscore the importance of exploring holistic approaches to mental health and well-being, acknowledging the interconnectedness of psychological, emotional, and physical aspects of human experience. Moreover, they raise intriguing possibilities for therapeutic interventions targeting sexual dysfunction, particularly in populations where conventional treatments may fall short. However, it’s crucial to recognize the limitations of the study, such as the narrow demographic focus and reliance on self-reported data, highlighting the need for further research with more diverse populations and rigorous methodologies. Overall, this research contributes valuable insights into the complex interplay between psychedelics, mental health, and sexual well-being, paving the way for future exploration and innovation in this ever-evolving field.

By Simon Jost 


PsyPal – EU funds groundbreaking research into psychedelic-assited therapy

PsyPal – EU funds groundbreaking research into psychedelic-assited therapy

A European consortium of 19 partners, which includes the OPEN Foundation, has been awarded over €6.5M by the European Union to study psilocybin to treat psychological distress in people with progressive incurable illnesses requiring palliative care. This is the first time the EU has funded a multi-site clinical study into psychedelic-assisted therapy. 

The randomised controlled trial (RCT) PsyPal, coordinated by the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands, and in collaboration with HumanKindLabs, marks the first-ever European grant to fund clinical research into psychedelic-assisted therapy. The trial will investigate whether psilocybin therapy can help ease psychological and existential distress in patients suffering from one of four different progressive diseases: the lung condition chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also known as MND), and atypical Parkinson’s disease (APD).

Commencing in early 2024, the PsyPal study will launch with the aim of treating over one hundred patients across four distinct clinical sites where each focuses on a specific condition: COPD at the University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG) in the Netherlands, APD at the Champalimaud Foundation in Portugal, MS at the National Institute of Mental Health in the Czech Republic, and ALS, jointly at the University of Copenhagen and the Bispebjerg Hospital in Denmark.

Participants will undergo two therapy sessions, receiving psilocybin (the active ingredient in psychedelic or ‘magic’ mushrooms) or a placebo. Previous pilot studies have shown substantial reduction in depressed mood and anxiety in people living with a terminal cancer diagnosis, with sometimes persistent benefits. 

PsyPal marks the first clinical trial studying the safety and effects of psilocybin in non-oncology palliative care patients. Robert Schoevers, head of psychiatry at the UMCG and principal investigator of PsyPal notes: “We are eager to see if we can ease the suffering of these patients whilst also examining longer-term patient and family outcomes of this treatment, something that often gets overlooked but that is of enormous importance.” 

European funding

This first-of-its-kind clinical trial is fully funded by Horizon Europe, the European Union’s key funding program for research and innovation. Horizon Europe aims to foster collaboration, bolster the impact of research and innovation, and address global challenges through the facilitation of EU policies. 

Schoevers says, “We are absolutely thrilled that the EU is supporting this ambitious collaborative study. There is growing recognition that psychedelic treatments may help patients for whom alternatives are not effective, and I am very glad we are receiving support from this highly prestigious funding program. It really helps to strengthen the collaboration between researchers from different countries and disciplines, focusing on potentially transformative interventions for severe, currently treatment-resistant mental disorders.”

Joost Breeksema, executive director of the OPEN Foundation, enthusiastically says: ”This is a major milestone for many reasons: we are getting unequivocal financial support from the EU, we are further developing psychedelic-assisted treatment for novel indications (including neurodegenerative and lung diseases) and we are further establishing the Netherlands as a country on the forefront of psychedelic research and therapy in Europe. We are proud to be a partner in this consortium, and to join a wider group of therapists and researchers involved in using psychedelics to address people’s needs in the palliative phase of their illness.”

Psychological and existential distress 

All four diseases are incurable and profoundly life-altering, leading to a loss of autonomy and severe psychological distress. Studies indicate that depression and anxiety symptoms affect 34% to 80% of individuals across these conditions, emphasising the pressing need for innovative interventions.

The impact of life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses on one’s physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well-being is profound. While some experience personal growth, others are confronted with a multitude of existential struggles, such as loss of hope and meaning, changes in family and societal roles, and feelings of burden. Consequently, depression, anxiety, demoralisation, and decreased quality of life are highly prevalent among these patients. Conventional interventions often fall short for these palliative care patients. This necessitates the need for innovative and effective treatments, such as psilocybin therapy.

Innovative therapeutic approach

Recent research in psychedelic science, particularly centred on psilocybin, has demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes for individuals grappling with depression and spiritual distress due to incurable illnesses, such as cancer. Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, which integrates the use of psilocybin in a secure setting alongside professional psychological support, is introducing an innovative therapeutic approach that addresses not just symptoms of depression and anxiety but also promotes spiritual well-being and quality of life in palliative care patients.

PsyPal combines psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy to address these deep-seated human needs in these terminal conditions. Beyond immediate clinical outcomes, it targets sustained well-being for patients and their families post-psilocybin treatment. Using peer support and online tools, the project aims to enhance coping mechanisms and alleviate distress as people approach the end of their lives.

Collaborative and interdisciplinary consortium 

This pioneering approach results in not just a clinical trial, but an interdisciplinary partnership consisting of 19 collaborating European organisations from 9 different countries. The consortium brings together a wide variety of specialists, including psychiatrists, palliative care physicians, psychologists, and experts in psilocybin therapy, alongside researchers focusing on spiritual care and representatives from religious institutions.

Breeksema: ”As OPEN, we’ll be jointly responsible to make sure that patients have continuous access to (peer) support, not just during the clinical trial phase, but also afterwards. This may be a difficult phase for people, and we think it is crucial to provide extensive support, enabling participants to process profound and sometimes difficult experiences.”

PsyPal Partners

The following organisations are part of the PsyPal consortium (listed alphabetically): 29k, A+ Science, Bispebjerg Hospital, Champalimaud Foundation, European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), European Federation of Neurological Associations (EFNA), European Psychiatric Association (EPA), HumanKindLabs, IESE Business School, Lung Alliance Netherlands, Madopa,  National Institute of Mental Health in the Czech Republic, Norrsken Mind, OPEN Foundation, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Copenhagen, University of Groningen, University of Stockholm, Uppsala University. 

In addition, the PsyPal consortium will be also actively engaging with PAREA (the Psychedelic Access and Research Europe Alliance).

The partners in the research consortium are committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in clinical and research practices, as laid out in the Horizon Europe regulation. Furthermore, the consortium will adhere to any requirements or recommendations from ethics committees and the regulatory authorities.

Disclaimer – PsyPal is funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Health and Digital Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.


Image credit: University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG)

Interdisciplinary conference on psychedelic research / iCPR 2024 6 – 8 June / Save the date!

The OPEN Foundation is thrilled to announce the highly anticipated 6th edition of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Psychedelic Research – Europe’s leading academic gathering dedicated to advancing psychedelic research and therapies.

After our hugely successful conference in 2022, we are returning to the prestigious Philharmonie Theatre in Haarlem (right next to Amsterdam).

ICPR provides a unique opportunity to get up to speed with the latest findings in psychedelic research. From clinical research and therapeutic paradigms to neuroscience, neurobiology and pharmacology, to consciousness and mysticism research, to anthropology, historical research, philosophy, social science and humanities studies, plus much more… 

ICPR 2022 aftermovie

ICPR conference takes place only once every two years, don’t miss out in June 6th to June 8th, 2024!

pre ICPR 2024 events, june 5th

Choose your event the day before ICPR

PAthways to access one-day summit

Potential FDA approval of MDMA-assisted therapy and growing evidence supporting psychedelic therapies, makes 2024 stand as a pivotal year for psychedelic medicine.

The Pathways to Access Summit (Paths) is a full-day add-on to the ICPR, dedicated to the challenges and opportunities around the development, approval & integration of psychedelic medicines into mainstream European health care.

Paths takes place the day before the ICPR 2024 conference, at the same location in Haarlem.

Expert-Led Workshops

Learn directly from world-esteemed experts in psychedelic therapy by joining one of two exclusive full-day workshops at the cutting edge.

workshop 1: Psychotherapy with psychedelics
with Torsten Passie, Bill Richards & Janis Phelps

Workshop 2: psychedelic integration
with rosalind watts & Marc Aixala

Workshops take place the day before the ICPR 2024 conference.

We hope to see you at the ICPR conference 2024!