OPEN Foundation

MDMA

Trouw: Ecstasy against PTSD

In anticipation of our conference, which took place last weekend, newspaper Trouw published an article in which Joost Breeksema (president of the OPEN Foundation) is interviewed. Today the newspaper writes about the research into the treatment of PTSD with MDMA that Peter Oehen presented at the conference. 

Trouw: “The study showed that patients, after the treatment with MDMA, experienced less anxiety and were better able to tolerate negative emotions. Moreover, they experienced less emotional and physical pain.”

DEA approves MDMA/PTSD study

More news on the subject of research: on august 27th 2010 the DEA, an American government organisation in charge of the laws regarding ‘controlled substances’ in the US, has approved a study regarding the effects of MDMA on war veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. MAPS can go ahead with the research, which will cost $500,000 and will take the good part of two years. Most of the budget still has to be found, but it’s a step in the right direction!

On the OPEN conference (october 23/24) you can hear more about these kinds of studies. Click here for more information.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV)

Abstract

This paper describes a refinement of Dittrich’s Altered States of Consciousness questionnaire. This questionnaire is among the most widely used self-report questionnaires for retrospectively assessing subjective experiences induced by psychedelics and other psychoactive drugs. Using data collected over many years from 591 human volunteers, they factored the original four subscales developed by Dittrich into 11 new subscales. This new improved instrument will play an important role in more precisely defining the qualitative subjective experiences in research with psychedelics.

Background: The OAV questionnaire has been developed to integrate research on altered states of consciousness (ASC). It measures three primary and one secondary dimensions of ASC that are hypothesized to be invariant across ASC induction methods. The OAV rating scale has been in use for more than 20 years and applied internationally in a broad range of research fields, yet its factorial structure has never been tested by structural equation modeling techniques and its psychometric properties have never been examined in large samples of experimentally induced ASC.

Methodology/Principal Findings: The present study conducted a psychometric evaluation of the OAV in a sample of psilocybin (n = 327), ketamine (n = 162), and MDMA (n = 102) induced ASC that was obtained by pooling data from 43 experimental studies. The factorial structure was examined by confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory structural equation modeling, hierarchical item clustering (ICLUST), and multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) modeling. The originally proposed model did not fit the data well even if zero-constraints on non-target factor loadings and residual correlations were relaxed. Furthermore, ICLUST suggested that the ‘‘oceanic boundlessness’’ and ‘‘visionary restructuralization’’ factors could be combined on a high level of the construct hierarchy. However, because these factors were multidimensional, we extracted and examined 11 new lower order factors. MIMIC modeling indicated that these factors were highly measurement invariant across drugs, settings, questionnaire versions, and sexes. The new factors were also demonstrated to have improved homogeneities, satisfactory reliabilities, discriminant and convergent validities, and to differentiate well among the three drug groups.

Conclusions/Significance: The original scales of the OAV were shown to be multidimensional constructs. Eleven new lower order scales were constructed and demonstrated to have desirable psychometric properties. The new lower order scales are most likely better suited to assess drug induced ASC.

Studerus, E., Gamma, A., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2010). Psychometric Evaluation of the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV). PLoS ONE, 5(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012412
Link to full text

Eerste MDMA/PTSS trial afgerond

Uit de eerste afgeronde klinische trial op het gebied van de behandeling van PTSS (posttraumatische stressstoornis) met MDMA is gebleken dat MDMA bij patiënten voor een verlichting van hun klachten kan zorgen: meer dan 80 procent van de deelnemers voldeden na de behandeling niet meer aan de voorwaarden voor PTSS zoals deze in de DSM-IV (het meest recente ‘handboek’ voor mentale stoornissen) zijn vermeld.

Het onderzoek richtte zich op twee psychotherapie-sessies van acht uur met een tussenperiode van drie tot vijf weken. Een deel van de proefpersonen kreeg MDMA, de rest kreeg een placebo. Ook ondergingen alle deelnemers wekelijks ‘normale’ psychotherapie. Tien van de twaalf mensen die MDMA kregen, reageerden positief op de behandeling.

Na twee maanden kregen de mensen uit de controlegroep de mogelijkheid om alsnog deel te nemen aan de behandeling, waarin ze nu wel MDMA zouden krijgen. Zeven van de acht mensen uit de controlegroep kozen hiervoor, met positieve resultaten. Het lijkt er dus op dat er een doorbraak is geweest in het onderzoek naar psychotherapie met behulp van MDMA, waardoor er ruimte is voor nieuwe onderzoeken – dat is goed nieuws!

First MDMA/PTSD trial finished

The first finished clinical trial regarding PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) and the treatment of that disorder with MDMA has indicated that MDMA can relieve PTSD symptoms: over 80 percent of the participants no longer met the requirements for PTSD as they are defined in DSM-IV (the most recent ‘handbook’ for mental disorders).

The study focused on two therapy sessions of eight hours with a period of three to five weeks in between. Some of the participants were given MDMA, the others were given a placebo. All participants also took part in weekly ‘normal’ psychotherapy sessions. Ten out of the twelve people that were given MDMA reacted positively on the treatment.

After two months, the people from the control group were given the opportunity to take part in the real treatment, where they would be given MDMA this time. Seven out of eight people from the control group chose to do this, with positive results. It seems as if there has been a breakthrough in researching psychotherapy with the aid of MDMA, making room for new studies – which is good news!

The safety and efficacy of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamineassisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder

Abstract

Case reports indicate that psychiatrists administered 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) as a catalyst to psychotherapy before recreational use of MDMA as ‘Ecstasy’ resulted in its criminalization in 1985. Over two decades later, this study is the first completed clinical trial evaluating MDMA as a therapeutic adjunct. Twenty patients with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder, refractory to both psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, were randomly assigned to psychotherapy with concomitant active drug (n¼12) or inactive placebo (n¼8) administered during two 8-h experimental psychotherapy sessions. Both groups received preparatory and follow-up non-drug psychotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the Clinician- Administered PTSD Scale, administered at baseline, 4 days after each experimental session, and 2 months after the second session. Neurocognitive testing, blood pressure, and temperature monitoring were performed. After 2-month follow-up, placebo subjects were offered the option to re-enroll in the experimental procedure with open-label MDMA. Decrease in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale scores from baseline was significantly greater for the group that received MDMA than for the placebo group at all three time points after baseline. The rate of clinical response was 10/12 (83%) in the active treatment group versus 2/8 (25%) in the placebo group. There were no drug-related serious adverse events, adverse neurocognitive effects or clinically significant blood pressure increases. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy can be administered to posttraumatic stress disorder patients without evidence of harm, and it may be useful in patients refractory to other treatments.

Mithoefer, M. C., Wagner, M. T., Mithoefer, A. T., Jerome, L., & Doblin, R. (2010). The safety and efficacy of ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamineassisted psychotherapy in subjects with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: the first randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 25(4), 439-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269881110378371
Link to full text

Rediscovering MDMA (ecstasy): the role of the American chemist Alexander T. Shulgin

Abstract

Aims: Alexander T. Shulgin is widely thought of as the ‘father’ of +/-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). This paper re-assesses his role in the modern history of this drug.

Methods: We analysed systematically Shulgin’s original publications on MDMA, his publications on the history of MDMA and his laboratory notebook.

Results: According to Shulgin’s book PIHKAL (1991), he synthesized MDMA in 1965, but did not try it. In the 1960s Shulgin also synthesized MDMA-related compounds such as 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3-methoxy- 4,5-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MMDA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE), but this had no impact on his rediscovery of MDMA. In the mid-1970s Shulgin learned of a ‘special effect’ caused by MDMA, whereupon he re-synthesized it and tried it himself in September 1976, as confirmed by his laboratory notebook. In 1977 he gave MDMA to Leo Zeff PhD, who used it as an adjunct to psychotherapy and introduced it to other psychotherapists.

Conclusion: Shulgin was not the first to synthesize MDMA, but he played an important role in its history. It seems plausible that he was so impressed by its effects that he introduced it to psychotherapist Zeff in 1977. This, and the fact that in 1978 he published with David Nichols the first paper on the pharmacological action of MDMA in humans, explains why Shulgin is sometimes (erroneously) called the ‘father’ of MDMA.

Benzenhöfer, U., & Passie, T. (2010). Rediscovering MDMA (ecstasy): the role of the American chemist Alexander T. Shulgin. Addiction, 105(8), 1355–1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02948.x
Link to full text

The persistence of the subjective in neuropsychopharmacology: observations of contemporary hallucinogen research

Abstract

The elimination of subjectivity through brain research and the replacement of so-called ‘folk psychology’ by a neuroscientifically enlightened worldview and self-conception has been both hoped for and feared. But this cultural revolution is still pending. Based on nine months of fieldwork on the revival of hallucinogen research since the ‘Decade of the Brain,’ this paper examines how subjective experience appears as epistemic object and practical problem in a psychopharmacological laboratory. In the quest for neural correlates of (drug-induced altered states of) consciousness, introspective accounts of test subjects play a crucial role in neuroimaging studies. Firsthand knowledge of the drugs’ flamboyant effects provides researchers with a personal knowledge not communicated in scientific publications, but key to the conduct of their experiments. In many cases, the ‘psychedelic experience’ draws scientists into the field and continues to inspire their self-image and way of life. By exploring these domains the paper points to a persistence of the subjective in contemporary neuropsychopharmacology.

Langlitz, N. (2010). The persistence of the subjective in neuropsychopharmacology: observations of contemporary hallucinogen research. History of Human Sciences, 23(1), 37-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695109352413
Link to full text

Psychedelics and the Human Receptorome

Abstract

We currently understand the mental effects of psychedelics to be caused by agonism or partial agonism of 5-HT2A (and possibly 5-HT2C) receptors, and we understand that psychedelic drugs, especially phenylalkylamines, are fairly selective for these two receptors. This manuscript is a reference work on the receptor affinity pharmacology of psychedelic drugs. New data is presented on the affinity of twenty-five psychedelic drugs at fifty-one receptors, transporters, and ion channels, assayed by the National Institute of Mental Health – Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH-PDSP). In addition, comparable data gathered from the literature on ten additional drugs is also presented (mostly assayed by the NIMH-PDSP). A new method is introduced for normalizing affinity (Ki) data that factors out potency so that the multi-receptor affinity profiles of different drugs can be directly compared and contrasted. The method is then used to compare the thirty-five drugs in graphical and tabular form. It is shown that psychedelic drugs, especially phenylalkylamines, are not as selective as generally believed, interacting with forty-two of forty-nine broadly assayed sites. The thirty-five drugs of the study have very diverse patterns of interaction with different classes of receptors, emphasizing eighteen different receptors. This diversity of receptor interaction may underlie the qualitative diversity of these drugs. It should be possible to use this diverse set of drugs as probes into the roles played by the various receptor systems in the human mind.

Ray, T. S. (2010). Psychedelics and the Human Receptorome. PLoS ONE, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009019
Link to full text

Cannabis and Ecstasy/MDMA: Empirical Measures of Creativity in Recreational Users

Abstract

This study investigated the associations between chronic cannabis and Ecstasy/MDMA use and one objective and two subjective measure of creativity. Fifteen abstinent Ecstasy users, 15 abstinent cannabis users, and 15 nondnig-user controls, completed three measures of creativity: the Consequences behavioral test of creativity, self-assessed performance on the Consequences test, and Gough’s Trait Self-Report Creative Adjective Checklist. The Consequences test involved five scenarios where possible consequences had to be devised; scoring was conducted by the standard blind rating (by two independent judges) for “remoteness” and “rarity,” and by a frequency and rarity of responses method. Cannabis users had significantly more “rare-creative” responses than controls (Tukey, p < 0.05); this effect remained significant with gender as a covariate. There were no significant differences between the groups on the number of standard scoring “remote-creative” ideas or for fluency of responses. On self-rated creativity, there was a significant ANOVA group difference (p < 0.05), with Ecstasy users tending to rate their answers as more creative than controls (Tukey comparison; p = 0.058, two-tailed). Ecstasy users did not differ from controls on the behavioral measures of creativity, although there was a borderline trend for self-assessment of greater creativity. Cannabis users produced significantly more “rare-creative” responses, but did not rate themselves as more creative.

Jones, K. A., Blagrove, M., & Parrott, A. C. Cannabis and Ecstasy/MDMA: Empirical Measures of Creativity in Recreational Users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(4), 323-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2009.10399769
Link to full text

interested in becoming a trained psychedelic-assisted therapist?

Management of Psychedelic-Related Complications - Online Event - Nov 20th