Reimagining Psychedelic Trials
Tehseen Noorani, PhD (Social Scientist, facilitator of Reimagining Psychedelic Trials working group), Dr. Boris Heifets, PhD (Assistant Professor at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Stanford University) & Katherine Hendy, PhD (Medical Anthropologist & Postdoctoral Fellow)
Wednesday 20 September, 8PM CET (7PM GMT, 2PM EST, 11AM PST)
Online (OPEN Community Platform)
Methodological pluralism in psychedelic studies
There are multiple ways of thinking about randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with psychedelics. Conventionally, they are approached as a means to establish gold-standard evidence concerning effectiveness and safety. This approach often leads to technical discussions on the challenges involved in designing and conducting such trials. A second way of approaching psychedelic RCTs considers them as an opportunity for gaining a deeper understanding of non-drug phenomena, including placebo effects and limitations inherent to the RCT framework. A third way of contemplating psychedelic RCTs is as the central knowledge-generation machinery of heavily capitalised industrial science. This directs attention towards broader questions, for instance whether the medicalisation of psychedelics can ever truly respect indigenous knowledge practices and traditions, or whether and how to reform drug regulatory systems so that they can accommodate interventions that are more oriented towards therapy than other drug-focused approaches.
In this online event we will discuss how the above issues have come up in our Reimagining Psychedelic Trials (RPT) working group, which has been meeting monthly for approximately 18 months. This interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder group brings together expertise related to psychedelic clinical trials with other methodological approaches to the study of psychedelics. Our diverse backgrounds, concerns, and interests serve as starting points for our discussions, with the aim of sharing not only our perspectives but also our concerns, paradigms, and languages.